(KULTUR vs Zivilisation)
"Spiders," Tyler says, "lay eggs and larvae are grafted into the skin. Just to say how bad life can be. " spiders, tarantulas, tarantella ... Harlequin and Punchinello. ... No missing Pierrot, burlesque, are: whether 'old ', masters of cunning and duplicity, and those sad, melancholic, in love with the moon. Although the first are all the rage now. But there who does the trick: the time is ripe to discard the opponent and score. Yes, there is always Who makes you trip him, who insists with Melina, who tries to get you going offside ... but if you do dribbling the cards and you know your 'web' you too can make your eggs the eggs of the dragon. Q uelle of Buttafuoco (again 'unmarked)? Or Dragons (marked in sight)? Boh, unless they are drugged. Dust there since tr oppa. And this time you give birth, no more larvae, but new ideas, if only embryonic: indeed, the egg is a symbol of rebirth. Cosmic renaissance (enough with the comic and seen the coma). And for a pope comes out a ruby \u200b\u200bis entering. Moreover, better Ruby (default) that Papi Chulo (not is cool).
"When Tyler invented Project Mayhem, Tyler said the goal of Project Mayhem had nothing to do with the next. Tyler did not care if someone else is hurt or not. The aim was to raise the consciousness of each participant in a project that has the power to control the story. We, each of us, we can take control of the world. It was at the fight club that Tyler invented Project Mayhem. " Yes, the ability to take 'control'. First of all, ourselves, and situations around us, then the world ... To do this, as stated in thought 'strategic' (the so-called "radical constructivism", the same GNP), it is necessary that we move from the 'cogito-centrism', namely the centrality of thought with respect to actions (the ' insight, the' awareness / rationalization ' action, digging deep into the psyche, etc.) to the ' action now ": first need to change the act, then, later, once you have changed the pattern perceptive-reactive (ie, the concrete results are achieved) will be much easier and more productive to change the thinking of the individual (and their behavior: the Weltanschauung - world view - total). So the first shape (the change of the 'frame', the reframing ), then the function. In fact, only after there has been a change, cognition, and will repeat it consciously apply to all situations, old and new. In short, we act! changed! Give change a chance! we change perspective and points of view: the important thing is to start, albeit with small steps: even an elephant can be eaten ... - into small chunks and not in one day. Ultimately, before the practice (A little 'shock to the' power '), then the theory (the' manifesto 'of the' party '). is where the sense of 'beauty' of change.
"Beauty is the gap that exists between the state of nature, and that 'more' to which we are called to be real men. The beauty is the ideal that reminds us that we are not made to live like brutes. That is why the ancients linked it to the Good and True. We we have deviated. The world, he wrote 'The Idiot' Dostoevsky, will be saved by beauty. A prophecy that now seems to have reversed. Because the cult of beauty - captured by the market, amplified by the media, from the ostentatious power - it produces a world that has never been so bad (...) To this point of view that only what is beautiful has value, is worthy of being appreciated bought, voted. We are all victims of this blunder. Why is this idea of \u200b\u200bempty beauty that is realized in the triumph of ugliness. In this sense, rather than save the world, the beauty seems to have condemned. As we set up a similar ideology? The beauty dies when it loses the connection with what is good and what is true. And if it is no longer capable of making signs to the ethical and moral values \u200b\u200bbecomes an empty shell, appunto, qualcosa che inseguiamo solo per affermare noi stessi. Ma cos'è la bellezza, qual è il suo significato più autentico? È la cosa più inutile che esista, ma di cui non possiamo fare a meno. Senza bellezza perdiamo la nostra umanità, siamo ridotti allo stato di natura. E come insegna il mito biblico della caduta, lo stato di natura non è affatto il luogo da cui proveniamo, bensì quello in cui siamo stati cacciati. E dal quale perciò dobbiamo uscire. Ecco, la bellezza è lo scarto che c'è tra lo stato di natura e quel 'di più' a cui siamo chiamati per essere davvero uomini. La bellezza è l'ideale che ci ricorda che non siamo fatti per vivere come bruti. È per questo che gli antichi la legavano al Bene e al Vero. Noi l'abbiamo dissociata.” (Sergio Givone).
Gottfried Benn, invece, aveva fatto centro: “Lo stile è superiore alla verità: reca in sé la prova dell’esistenza.” Sì, anche nelle cose quotidiane occorre tornare al ‘Grande Stile’ (anche, e soprattutto, quando è minimal, brut ). Per poi stilettarlo. Sfregiarlo, sfrangiarlo, friggerlo. Eros, eresia, eroismo, arte, ieraticità. Stile come humanitas. E areté . Se si living with style, you can easily switch from baroque to minimal (even burlesque ) . Ruby itself has (at least in the making) capabilities, and Noemi Berluska I fear not (but never say never). Who has an origin 'antique', ancestral ideals of 'solid' (and even property damaged or 'rotten'), as in the case of Karima (the 'past' of Ruby), remains in constant tension - rocking - between archetype and adveniente future. It can 'escape', while renewing. The important thing is to combine kalòs e agathòs: bene e bello, arte e tecnica. “Quando l’arte novecentesca, sovrastata dal sapere scientifico e dalla massificazione antielitaria dei processi di produzione industriale, incomincia a perdere la sua funzione di educazione estetica, di formazione del gusto, di relazione identitaria con i sentimenti, le passioni, la religiosità di un popolo, finisce per diventare un esercizio retorico individuale, ipersoggettivo, nichilista. L’arte non ha più nessuna funzione, e così pure quell’arte che si chiama architettura.” (Stefano Zecchi).
As above, so below, on the right as left, faces toward the future, but with the memory of the past. lovers again, but sensitive to the charm of 'old'. Modern and anti-modern, even oxymoronic art and architecture. Minimalist but still revelers (the 'style', and stiletto, to Gaudi - saint now! - and Frank O. Gehry. It is here, in style, the Berluska helmet - not only here, to tell the truth ...). The Vitruvian triad firmitas, utilitas and venustas (with concinnitas to make a flywheel) must make a companion piece to the triad Baudelaire "luxury, calm and voluptuousness." architecture, like Cecil Balmond, a versatile engineering guru, is "much more than building buildings. The structure gives meaning to things. Even when you have to hold a debate with words, if you do not have the structure, you have nothing. "
must, ultimately, be well structured (also in the de-construction). Especially in philosophy (of life). A Mammon should prefer Sophia!
0 comments:
Post a Comment